Sunday, January 8, 2012

Papa needs to spank his employees in NYC.

(CNN) -- Papa John's Pizza fired a cashier at one of its New York restaurants and apologized to an Asian-American customer for a receipt that identified her as "lady chinky eyes."
 
"We were extremely concerned to learn of the receipt issued in New York," the company said in a statement posted on its Facebook page Saturday.
 
Minhee Cho, a communications manager at nonprofit investigative journalism group ProPublica, posted a photo of the receipt on her Twitter account Saturday morning and by the afternoon it was picked up by a local newspaper.
 
Along with the receipt, Cho tweeted "just FYI my name isn't 'lady chinky eyes.'"
 
The receipt had been viewed online almost 200,000 times by Sunday afternoon, according to the counter on the Twitpic page.
 
Cho did not immediately respond to CNN's request for comment, but her boss did.
 
"This blew up far beyond Minhee's expectations," ProPublica spokesman Mike Webb said in an e-mail. "She has reporters coming to her apartment, and that's annoying. So she wants it to blow over and she has nothing more to say."
 
Cho was a customer Friday night at the Papa John's on Broadway in Manhattan's Hamilton Heights neighborhood, according to the receipt.
 
"This act goes against our company values, and we've confirmed with the franchisee that this matter was addressed immediately and that the employee is being terminated," the pizza company said. "We are truly sorry for this customer's experience."

Friday, January 6, 2012

All-American Bigotry

Islamophobes would like you to believe that they're not anti-Islam. They're only anti-Islamic extremism.

So why is it that Islamophobes are always going after mainstream Islam? They lampoon Muhammad. They want to burn not the writings of Osama bin Laden but the Quran itself. They target an Islamic community center in downtown New York City that's the brainchild of an interfaith dialogue proponent and an overseas emissary of the George W. Bush administration. 
 
And now they're venting spleen at an innocuous cable TV show called "All-American Muslim." This reality show on TLC follows five Muslim families in Dearborn, Mich. It explores typical family situations (getting married, having a baby), cultural traditions (hookah, bellydancing) and religious experiences (wearing the hijab, converting to Islam). There's a cop, a football coach, a businesswoman, a tattooed rebel. The program showcases the diversity of the community. 
 
It's so all-American, so earnest in its efforts not to offend anyone, that it verges on boring. Sure, the show does address some provocative issues, such as anti-Muslim sentiment and 9/11. And there are the usual inter-personal tensions familiar to reality-show connoisseurs. But all in all, it's light on outrageousness and exhibitionism, two critical qualities for successful television these days.
 
You'd think that social conservatives would embrace ventures like "All-American Muslim." The show features people who are hard-working, religious and family-oriented. But that's not how bigotry operates. Otherwise, social conservatives would be the first in line to support gay marriage and the repeal of don't ask, don't tell in the military. 
 
It was no surprise, then, that the Florida Family Association, an evangelical Christian outfit infamous for its intolerance, called on advertisers to boycott "All-American Muslim." Several businesses cravenly followed suit, most prominently the home improvement chain Lowes. In mid-December, Lowe's issued a half-hearted apology but refused to reinstate its ads on the show, which will air the final show of its first season on Jan. 8.
 
Both Florida Family Association, and noted Islamophobes like Pamela Geller who have supported its campaign, complain that "All-American Muslim" is not representative because it doesn't dwell on sharia law or feature a terrorist or two. 
 
But although it might boost ratings considerably -- and "All-American Muslim" has seen its viewership slip recently -- the inclusion of a terrorist in the program would not be representative. Political extremism is in fact extremely rare in the Muslim-American community. 
 
Since 9/11, there have been only 11 cases of Muslim Americans who have committed terrorist acts in this country, resulting in 33 deaths. Between 1980 and 2005, according to FBI statistics, approximately 6 percent of all terrorist attacks in the United States were conducted by Islamic extremists. These perpetrators of violence are not representative of the 2.75 million Muslim Americans. Moreover, Muslim American organizations have all condemned terrorism, and the FBI has long relied on the help of the community to identify the few individuals who are inclined toward violence. As for sharia law, except for one minor case in New Jersey that was subsequently overturned, it has had no impact on the U.S. court system.
 
In other words, the attempts by Islamophobes to rationalize their bigotry on factual grounds is just plain wrong.
 
I'm no fan of reality shows. But if "All-American Muslim" can prove to mainstream America that Muslims are as boring, community-minded, socially conservative, occasionally wacky and celebrity-obsessed as the rest of us, then it deserves a place on TV. And companies like Lowe's should support it. 
 
It's one thing for big mouths on the margins to voice their extremism. There's a long American tradition of that, from anti-Catholic Know Nothings and the Ku Klux Klan to anti-Semitic preachers and homophobic radio hosts. 
 
But it's quite another matter when these extremists block community centers, win passage of ludicrous anti-sharia laws and convince major U.S. businesses to join their Islamophobic campaigns. There's an equally long American tradition of denouncing bigotry. In the TLC show, Muslims amply demonstrate that they're ordinary, mainstream Americans. Now it's time for the rest of us to do the same by standing up to the Islamophobes.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/john-feffer/allamerican-bigotry_b_1179872.html
 
John Feffer's latest book is the forthcoming 'Crusade 2.0' (City Lights).

SANTORUM LOSES BY 8 IN IOWA

After losing by 8 votes in Iowa, Rick Santorum boasts.

Wednesday, January 4, 2012

Dallas teen missing since 2010 was mistakenly deported

I GUESS BEING BLACK AND SPEAKING ABSOLUTELY NO SPANISH ARE GROUNDS FOR DEPORTATION TO COLUMBIA.
________________________________________

DALLAS - “It's very frustrating," Lorene Turner said.

She has spent hours on Facebook trying to find her granddaughter, Jakadrien.

"Once I get home I am up until 3 or 4 in the morning searching and looking," Turner said. "It's all I can think about. Finding my baby."

Turner has been searching for Jakadrien since the fall of 2010, when she ran away from home. She was 14 years old and distraught over the loss of her grandfather and her parents’ divorce.

Turner searched for months for a clue.

"God just kept leading me," she said. "I wake up in the middle of the night and do whatever God told me to do, and I found her."

Turner said with the help of Dallas Police, she found her granddaughter in the most unexpected place - Colombia.

Where she had mistakenly been deported by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) in April of 2011.

"They didn't do their work," Turner said. "How do you deport a teenager and send her to Colombia without a passport, without anything?"

News 8 learned that Jakadrien somehow ended up in Houston, where she was arrested by Houston police for theft. She gave Houston police a fake name. When police in Houston ran that name, it belonged to a 22-year-old illegal immigrant from Colombia, who had warrants for her arrest.

So ICE officials stepped in.

News 8 has learned ICE took the girl's fingerprints, but somehow didn't confirm her identity and deported her to Colombia, where the Colombian government gave her a work card and released her.

"She talked about how they had her working in this big house cleaning all day, and how tired she was," Turner said.

Through her granddaughter’s Facebook messages, Turner says she tracked Jakadrian down.

U.S. Federal authorities got an address. U.S. Embassy officials in Colombia asked police to pick her up.

But that was a month ago, and the Colombian government now has her in a detention facility and won't release her, despite her family's request.

"I feel like she will come home," the grandmother said with tears in her eyes. "I just need help and prayer.”

There are still many unanswered questions about how an African-American girl who speaks no Spanish is mistaken for a foreign national. Immigration officials are investigating and released a statement late Tuesday.
  
"ICE takes these allegations very seriously," said ICE Director of Public Affairs Brian Hale. " At the direction of [the Department of Homeland Security], ICE is fully and immediately investigating this matter in order to expeditiously determine the facts of this case."
 
ICE officials also noted there have been instances where ICE has seen cases of individuals providing inaccurate information regarding who they are and their immigration status for ulterior motives.

Wednesday, December 28, 2011

Former Aspen homeless man in N.D. jail -

Remember last week when I posted the story of Aspen Colorado sending a homeless criminal to North Dakota...well it seems that the prophesy was fulfilled.
THANKS ASPEN!!!

======================================================



Writer:  Carolyn Sackariason
 
A former Aspen homeless man in trouble with the law here who was given a free bus ticket to North Dakota last week remained in jail in Williston, N.D. on Tuesday, held on a disorderly conduct charge.
 
Jimmy Baldwin Jr., 32, was arrested on Friday at about 7 p.m. after he allegedly urinated on the front of Whispers strip club in Williston. Baldwin, who was shirtless, was arrested for disorderly conduct and given no trespass warnings for that strip club, as well as another one called Heartbreakers, according to a report filed by the Williston Police Department.
 
He told officers that his hand was swelling up and claimed his foot was hurt, and wanted to go to the emergency room, according to the police report. He was cited and released on a personal recognizance bond.
 
Shortly after that incident, an employee at a funeral home called Williston police saying that he came upon Baldwin outside of the business, asking for an ambulance. Baldwin was brought to Mercy Medical Center where he refused treatment and was being disorderly in the ER, according to Williston police. He was transported to the Williams County jail and booked on a misdemeanor disorderly conduct charge.
 
Baldwin was given a free bus ticket through the Aspen Homeless Shelter, paid for by an anonymous donor, on Dec. 19, one day after he was arrested for disorderly conduct, menacing and possession of marijuana after allegedly causing a disturbance at the fire pit on the Cooper Avenue mall.
 
He was issued a summons and his first court appearance for those charges is scheduled for Jan. 17. Deputy District Attorney Richard Nedlin, who is prosecuting Baldwin in county court, said the misdemeanor charges will not be dismissed.
 
If Baldwin fails to appear in court, a judge will determine what his bond should be set at and will issue a warrant for his arrest. However, it would be an in-state warrant, meaning if Baldwin is arrested outside of Colorado, authorities will not be notified of his pending charges in Aspen, Nedlin said.
 
Baldwin has been cited numerous times by Aspen police, mostly for minor infractions like trespassing, disorderly conduct and drinking in public. Jim True, prosecutor for the city of Aspen, last Wednesday agreed to a 30-day continuance for Baldwin’s trial, which was scheduled for Dec. 21 after he pleaded not guilty to a trespassing count.
 
True said he plans to continue the case indefinitely.
 
“If he’s in town, he needs to show up [to municipal court],” he said. “If he’s not in town, I will continue it for another month. ... Right now, I’m just going to play it by ear.”
 
True said that Baldwin told him he had a friend in North Dakota who had a job for him in the oil fields but had no way of getting there.
 
Shortly after, Aspen Homeless Shelter director Dr. Vince Savage offered Baldwin a one-way ticket to the city of Williston, in northwestern North Dakota near the state’s “oil patch.” He has since defended the action, saying Baldwin wasn’t forced to leave Aspen and that he wanted to go there to try to start a new life. 
 
Regardless, the move set off a deluge of outraged people in North Dakota decrying that Aspen is using their state as a dumping ground for unwanted citizens. They also point out that the state is suffering from an acute housing shortage in the oil-producing region. Since the Aspen Daily News first reported Baldwin’s relocation on Dec. 21, the newspaper has received at least 70 letters to the editor from angry North Dakotans. 

http://www.aspendailynews.com/section/home/150950

Oil boom splits tiny North Dakota town

Just like everybody else around here, Fred Evans spent his life coaxing a good enough living out of the earth. He grew wheat, ran cattle and, during a couple of short-lived bursts of activity, worked on the drill rigs searching for oil across the northern prairie. 
 
But unlike his neighbors, Mr. Evans was convinced that the area would someday be home to an epic oil boom. For years he would approach others in the area offering to buy or lease the rights to drill on their land, often delivering his pitch at a time of need. More than a few, to their enduring regret, agreed. 
 
So it was with pure jubilation that Mr. Evans, who hides a businessman’s sensibility under a broad-brimmed cowboy hat and a stable of folksy aphorisms, watched one of the rumbling pump jacks on his property pulling up the oil that has made him a rich man.
 
“It’s like music,” he said, raising his voice over the noise. “Ka-ching, ka-ching, ka-ching.” 
 
Sure enough, money is flowing by the barrelful into Mountrail County, transforming a tiny community once proudly situated in the middle of nowhere into an unexpected oasis of prosperity at the heart of the nation’s biggest oil play. 
 
No other county in the state has had a bigger jump in the number of households earning more than $100,000, which spiked to 21 percent from 6 percent during the last decade, according to an analysis of census data. But much like the crude below, the benefits have spread unevenly, often as a result of decisions made long ago. 
 
As some residents find themselves cashing oil royalty checks worth tens of thousands of dollars a month or more, many of their neighbors are resigned to receiving almost nothing from the wells that pepper the landscape and even their own land — aside from the headaches that go with living in a boomtown.
 
Marlene Gunderson, who works alongside her husband and daughter at the county courthouse researching the ownership history of every acre of property for oil companies, stumbles across the names of neighbors who are receiving huge checks for mineral interests, though she has none herself. 
 
“That’s just the way life goes,” she mused. “Some people get. Some don’t.” 
 
As with any major boom — from real estate to tech stocks to natural resources — the sudden split between the winners and the witnesses has been painful. But this is happening in a small town, where proximity and familiarity make a sudden reordering all the more difficult. 
 
“It’s not all good,” said Leslie Anderson, who is among the lucky locals who sometimes make more from a single month of oil payments than he used to earn in a year of farming. “There are lots of families fighting that got along before.” 
 
After more than five years of oil-driven growth, Mountrail County, which a decade ago had shrunk to less than half its peak size before the Great Depression, registered an official population of 7,673 in the 2010 census, though local leaders believe there are thousands more. 
 
With the unemployment rate at only 1.3 percent, local sons and daughters are no longer leaving to find work.
 
And as the rest of the nation watched incomes drop or stagnate, in Mountrail County median income rose more than 50 percent in the last decade, the fifth-highest gain in the nation. Residents earned on average an additional $20,000, adjusted for inflation, according to an analysis of census data by Andrew A. Beveridge, a demographer at Queens College in New York. 
 
At one of the local banks in Stanley, the county seat, deposits have increased to $135 million from $43 million before the boom. But the new wealth is not always easy to spot. 
 
Residents say a culture of modest living means they don’t know for sure which of their neighbors are making money off oil, though they have suspicions. 
 
“I’m seeing people that have never owned a new vehicle in their life driving a new car,” said Wade Enget, a local lawyer, who estimated that about half the residents are receiving oil money. “People who never took a day off are going on vacation.” 
 
The main driver is the payments that residents receive for leasing mineral rights. In 2009, the most recent year statistics are available, the signing bonuses and the royalties paid for the oil extracted from private land totaled about $1 billion statewide, according to an industry-financed study by North Dakota State University. 
 
Though many of those checks go out of state — to the far-flung descendants of homesteaders or to companies that bought mineral rights — more than half stay in North Dakota, helping double the number of state residents earning more than $1 million a year. And the checks are likely to continue, said Lynn D. Helms, director of the state’s Department of Mineral Resources, citing estimates that the average well will pay about $10 million in royalties over three decades. 
 
Living in a simple trailer home, Lenin Dibble reveals few signs that he has suddenly become a wealthy man. A retired farmer and rancher, Mr. Dibble receives royalty checks of as much as $80,000 a month for his small share of mineral rights. To explain his frugal lifestyle, he pulled out a letter from his father, yellowed from the passage of half a century.
 
“When you get a few dollars in your pocket never advertise it,” he read. “And hold a conference before spending any of it.”
 
And as he finished, Mr. Dibble insisted he does not need any of the oil money, which he has been saving for his adult children, because Social Security and payments for leasing out his farmland were enough. What he and others in town notice more than the newfound money are the problems: locking the door to his house, taking the keys out of his car and seeing a quiet community where everyone knew everyone overrun by the bustle of strangers. 
 
“I wish it had never happened,” he said.
 
Because land and the rights to whatever lies beneath it can be sold separately in North Dakota, only about one in five royalty checks goes to the owner of the land where the oil is being extracted. Though some residents never acquired mineral rights when they bought property, the payday has been most distressing for those living on longtime family estates where the mineral rights were sold off, often for a tiny fraction of their current value. 
 
“There are only two reasons people sold,” said Roger Cymbaluk, a prominent real estate broker in nearby Williston. “One, they didn’t know what they were worth; two, they were desperate.” 
 
Some used mineral rights in lieu of cash to settle debts during hard times — trading some acres to banks to satisfy a mortgage. Others sold them to savvier industry veterans after oil was first discovered six decades ago, which is why an outsize portion of the royalty checks for North Dakota oil head each month to Texas. 
 
Stanley Wright, who used to sell farm equipment in Stanley, described how he took a substantial loss — and suffered the wrath of his wife — when he allowed two farmers to pay him with mineral acres. Now that the gamble has paid off decades later, he wrestles with guilt over his windfall. His eyes well up and his hands start to shake as he insists he never took advantage of anyone. “Minerals in those days weren’t worth anything,” he said. 
 
In recent decades, people have been more reluctant to sell, though offers keep coming. For those landowners who do not own the mineral rights, the usual compensation has been a few thousand dollars for the disruption of hosting an oil rig. Even with the dust, noise and traffic, the most frustrating part is watching the wells on his property earning money for other people, said Mark Ellis, a farmer and rancher. 
 
“It’s more interesting when you’re getting a piece of it,” he said. 
 
Living just down the road from where the skeleton of a one-room schoolhouse still stands, Mr. Evans, 73, is unapologetic, if vague, about his success, which he said resulted from decades of groundwork. 
 
Now he is described variously by neighbors as the richest man and the biggest crook in Mountrail County. Some of them recounted visits during which Mr. Evans tried to offer them deals they believed were designed to take advantage of their ignorance or misfortune. Several noted that even his sisters took him to court in a dispute over family mineral rights. 
 
Mr. Evans, who calls himself “a Podunk from farm country,” brushes it all aside. “I’m definitely not a fortune teller,” he said. “But I just knew this thing would take off. I’ve been wrong other times, but I felt it.” 
 
This article, "A Great Divide Over Oil Riches," first appeared in The New York Times.

Tuesday, December 27, 2011

Nothing like a good ol' fashioned cartel to jack up prices and screw the consumer

NEW YORK (CNNMoney) -- Eight state attorneys general announced a $538 million settlement with electronics makers Tuesday over allegations of price-fixing in LCD panels.
 
Florida attorney general Pam Bondi said in a statement that electronics manufacturers including Hitachi (HIT), Sharp (SHCAY) and Samsung had "organized the conspiracy at the highest levels of their organizations in various secret meetings and telephone conversations."
 
The companies are accused of colluding to fix prices for thin film transistor LCD panels, which are used in a variety of consumer products including computer screens and flat-panel televisions.
 
The New York attorney general's office said that up to $501 million of the settlement announced Tuesday "will be available for partial refunds" for consumers in 24 states and Washington, D.C., who purchased qualifying products between 1999 and 2006. 
 
http://money.cnn.com/2011/12/27/news/lcd_panels_settlement/index.htm?iid=HP_LN&hpt=hp_t2